TRX International

Your next role, from someone who knows the work.

No mass mailshots, no roles that do not exist, and no CV sent anywhere you did not agree to. If a move is not right for you, we will say that too.

Explore career paths
Six areas, one conversation
Large new buildOperationsDecommissioningRadioactive wasteSMR / MMRFusionTRX

A short list of things we actually commit to.

Your CV stays put

Nothing is sent to any client until you have seen that client named and said yes. Nuclear is a small industry, and an unauthorised submission can quietly close a door you did not know was open.

Straight answers

What the role actually pays, whether the programme is genuinely funded, what the site is like to work on day to day, and who you would be reporting to.

A reply either way

Including when the answer is no. Silence after an interview is the most common complaint about recruiters in this industry and it is entirely avoidable.

Six areas, six very different careers.

People often assume nuclear is one job market. It is at least six, and they reward completely different temperaments. Worth knowing which one suits you before you commit a decade to it.

Large new build

Intense, deadline driven and highly visible. You are building something that did not exist, usually against a schedule the whole country can see.

Suits
People who like scale, tolerate scrutiny, and want a project on their CV that opens doors for the next twenty years.
Getting in
Common routes in: construction and commissioning from other heavy industry, or moving across from an operating station into a build programme.

Operations

Structured, disciplined and shift based at the sharp end. Deep familiarity with one plant, and real accountability for keeping it running safely.

Suits
People who value stability, mastery of a single complex system, and clear progression through a licensing ladder.
Getting in
Common routes in: technician and engineering apprenticeships, ex military nuclear, or graduate entry into plant engineering.

Decommissioning

Problem solving on facilities that were never designed to be taken apart. Slower paced than build, and unusually varied.

Suits
People who enjoy characterisation puzzles, hands off techniques and long horizons without a fixed answer at the start.
Getting in
Common routes in: radiological protection, waste engineering, or operations experience on a station approaching end of life.

Radioactive waste

Analytical and document heavy, with a time horizon unlike anything else in engineering. Your safety argument has to survive you.

Suits
People with genuine intellectual patience who want work that is more about reasoning than throughput.
Getting in
Common routes in: geoscience, criticality and shielding, environmental safety, or regulatory backgrounds.

SMR / MMR

Fast, ambiguous and commercially charged. Fewer people, broader remits, and processes you help write rather than inherit.

Suits
People who are comfortable without precedent, and who can still write something a regulator will accept.
Getting in
Common routes in: design and analysis roles in the existing fleet, or research moving into industry.

Fusion

Research adjacent engineering at the edge of what has been demonstrated. Long horizons and genuine scientific uncertainty.

Suits
People motivated by the problem itself, who accept that the commercial timeline is not settled.
Getting in
Common routes in: national laboratories, accelerator and magnet engineering, plasma physics doctorates, or cryogenics and vacuum from other sectors.

From first call to first day.

1

A conversation, not a screening call

We start by understanding what you actually do. Your real scope, what you authored versus reviewed, what you own on a bad day. If we have nothing suitable we will tell you, rather than keeping you warm for six months.

2

Honest market context

What your discipline is genuinely worth right now, which programmes are funded and moving, and where the market is soft. Including when the honest answer is that staying where you are is the better move.

3

Roles put to you by name

Nothing is sent anywhere until you have seen the client named and agreed. Nuclear is small, and an unauthorised CV submission can close doors you did not know were open.

4

Preparation that reflects the panel

We tell you who is interviewing, what they will press on, and how the technical assessment is structured. No generic interview tips.

5

Support through notice and start

Counter offers, relocation, notice negotiation and onboarding. We stay in contact until you are actually on site and settled, not until the invoice clears.

What actually moves your market value.

Not what most career advice says. These are the four variables we see genuinely change what someone is offered, in this industry specifically.

01

Evidence of scope, not job titles

Two people with identical titles can be a decade apart in real accountability. What moves your value is being able to show what you personally owned, decided and signed.

02

Regime literacy

Experience under one regulator does not automatically satisfy another, but people who can explain how a submission works in more than one regime are consistently scarcer and better paid than people who cannot.

03

Scarcity of your specific discipline

Broad engineering capability is valuable. A narrow capability that only a few hundred people worldwide genuinely hold is valuable in a completely different way, and it is worth knowing which one you have.

04

Willingness to move, and how far

Mobility is one of the few variables entirely within your control. Being open to a different site, region or country changes the size of your market immediately.

Most nuclear CVs undersell the work.

Engineers describe the project and leave out their own scope. A reviewer cannot tell whether you authored the document or checked it, whether you held the accountability or supported the person who did. That ambiguity costs interviews before anyone speaks to you.

It is rarely a writing problem. It is that the things a nuclear hiring manager scans for first are usually buried on page two.

What a review covers

  • Whether your real scope and accountability are visible in the first ten seconds
  • Whether you authored, reviewed, approved or supported, stated explicitly for each project
  • Whether your terminology matches the regime you are applying into
  • Which of your projects a hiring manager will care about, and which are noise
  • Whether plant type, reactor technology and lifecycle stage are actually named
  • What is missing that technical panels reliably ask about
Read the full CV guide

Working in another country.

Nuclear talent crosses borders more than almost any other technical workforce. Here is what actually determines whether a move is realistic.

What usually transfers well

Core engineering discipline, safety culture, and any experience of taking a submission through a regulator. The underlying physics does not change at a border.

What usually needs translating

Regime specific process knowledge, local codes and standards, and the vocabulary. The same activity often has a different name in each market, and CVs get filtered on names.

What genuinely blocks a move

Nationality and residency rules on sensitive programmes, export control, and family logistics. We check these at the start rather than after you have got attached to a role.

The ones worth answering properly.

No, and this is not a soft commitment. Nothing goes to any client until you have seen that client named and said yes. Nuclear is a small industry, and an unauthorised submission can quietly close a door you did not know was open.
Most of the people we place were not on the market when we first called them. A conversation costs you half an hour and gives you a calibration on your own market value, which is useful even if you stay exactly where you are.
Often yes, and nuclear talent crosses borders more than most technical workforces. The constraints that actually matter are nationality and residency rules on sensitive programmes, export control, and whether your regulatory experience is recognised in the destination regime.
You get a reply either way, including when the answer is no. Silence after an interview is the single most common complaint about recruiters in this industry and it is entirely avoidable.
Not for recruitment. Our fees are paid by employers. The optional CV review service is separate and clearly priced, and it is not a condition of being represented for any role.

Not actively looking? Still worth a conversation.

Most of the people we place were not on the market when we first called them.