TRX International

Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) engineerSalary, qualifications, career path and hiring demand, 2026 edition

A probabilistic safety analysis engineer builds and maintains quantitative models of nuclear risk: initiating events, event trees, fault tree analysis, equipment reliability, human error, common-mode failures, internal and external events, severe-accident progression and uncertainty. The job turns nuclear power plant design and plant-specific data into risk insights such as core-damage frequency and release frequency, then uses those insights to challenge reactor technologies, support nuclear regulatory commission safety cases and inform risk-sensitive decisions throughout the nuclear lifecycle.

Nuclear safetyPRA / PSAFault treesEvent treesRiskSpectrum / CAFTARisk-informed design
In short

PSA engineer is not a separately coded national wage occupation, so the ladder below is a TRX 2026 market model anchored to live nuclear postings and the broader US nuclear-engineer series. Westinghouse is advertising entry PRA engineering at $58,400–$73,000 and senior PRA work at $85,200–$106,500; Rolls-Royce SMR is advertising £48,000–£63,000 for a PSA engineer, while UK specialist assessor roles are reaching about £80,000.

There is no universal PSA licence. The gate is evidence that you can build, quantify, review and defend a model under a recognised framework: ASME/ANS standards and NRC guidance in the US, or ONR SAPs and PSA TAGs in the UK. Employers then screen for software depth, plant-systems understanding, HRA/CCF judgement, hazard modelling, uncertainty treatment, model configuration control and, on sensitive programmes, security clearance.

Live 2026 Rolls-Royce SMR PSA engineer salary range
£0£48,000–£63,000
Live 2026 Westinghouse PRA Engineer I salary range
$0$58,400–$73,000
Current Westinghouse senior PRA engineering salary anchor
$0$85,200–$106,500
Level 1 core damage, Level 2 release/containment and Level 3 off-site consequence risk
0levels
Role snapshot

The role at a glance

Everything an employer will ask about in the first fifteen minutes of a screening call.

Latest Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) Engineer Jobs
Also called
Probabilistic risk assessment engineer · PRA engineer · probabilistic safety analyst · nuclear risk analyst · PSA specialist · risk engineer
Entry qualification
Degree in nuclear, mechanical, electrical, chemical or systems engineering, physics or mathematics. Graduate entry exists; plant-systems knowledge and quantitative modelling quickly become the real filters.
Typical entry pay
$58,400–$75,000 (US PRA Engineer I) · £38,000–£48,000 (UK early-career PSA/safety analyst).
Senior pay
$120,000–$160,000 principal, toward $185,000 lead/manager · £62,000–£80,000 principal, toward £100,000 lead/manager.
Contract day rates
£500–£700 established; £650–£900 principal, peer-review, hazards or cleared work; about $70–$130/hr US specialist consulting.
Professional gate
No single licence. CEng/PE helps; model ownership, peer-review closure, regulator-facing delivery and competence against PSA standards decide the shortlist.
Security
UK BPSS common, SC/DV on sensitive programmes. US plant access varies; federal, DOE/NNSA and naval work may add citizenship or clearance requirements.
Where the work sits
Utilities, reactor vendors, SMR/advanced-reactor developers, consultancies, new build, operating-fleet safety teams, regulators, national laboratories and defence nuclear.
Travel
Low to moderate. Plant walkdowns, peer reviews, customer workshops, design reviews and regulator meetings create periodic site travel.
TRX segments
Large new build · New technology development · Operating fleet · Defence nuclear · Decommissioning · Government / national laboratories
What the job is

Six versions of the same job title

PSA is one discipline, but the work changes materially with plant lifecycle, hazard class and how the model is being used. The title is broad; the modelling boundary, standard and decision being supported are not.

Operating LWR Level 1 / LERF PSA

Maintains the internal-events model for an operating PWR/BWR: initiating events, event and fault trees, success criteria, component data, HRA, CCF, quantification, cutsets and importance measures.

ROLESPRA engineer · PSA analyst · risk engineer · PRA model owner

Advanced reactor / new-build design PSA

Develops PSA while the design is still moving, using risk insights to change system architecture, redundancy, diversity, operator actions and safety classification rather than merely documenting a finished plant.

ROLESPSA engineer · PRA design lead · risk-informed design engineer

Fire, seismic and external-hazards PRA

Extends the model beyond internal events into fire scenarios, seismic fragility, flooding, high winds and other hazards where spatial data, screening and specialist engineering interfaces dominate.

ROLESfire PRA engineer · seismic PRA analyst · external-hazards risk engineer

Level 2 / severe-accident PSA

Starts from core-damage states and models containment response, accident progression, source-term/release categories and large or early release frequencies.

ROLESLevel 2 PSA engineer · severe-accident risk analyst · containment risk specialist

Risk-informed operations and licensing

Uses a maintained model to support configuration risk, maintenance planning, technical-specification changes, in-service inspection/testing, plant modifications and other risk-informed applications.

ROLESrisk applications engineer · PRA applications engineer · configuration risk analyst

Defence / naval and high-hazard facility PSA

Applies probabilistic reasoning to naval propulsion, defence nuclear or non-standard facilities where hazards, mission states, security constraints and authorised safety-case arrangements differ from civil power.

ROLESPSA engineer (defence) · probabilistic safety assessor · nuclear risk specialist
A working day

What the week actually looks like

A composite day for a senior PSA engineer supporting a reactor design or operating plant. Most of the work is model-based, but the engineer spends almost as much time testing assumptions against system design, operating procedures, human actions and other safety disciplines as they do running the software.

Model-based · typical TuesdayHybrid, with plant and review time
08:00
Model health and change reviewCheck overnight quantification, model errors, configuration changes, open assumptions and engineering-change notifications. Decide which plant or design changes require model updates before risk results can be relied upon.
09:15
Event and fault tree developmentBuild or revise sequences for an initiating event, trace system success criteria through drawings and procedures, and challenge whether dependencies, recovery actions and failure modes are represented correctly rather than conveniently.
10:45
Reliability, HRA and CCF sessionReview component failure data, maintenance evidence, common-cause parameters and operator-response assumptions with systems, human-factors and operations specialists. The difficult part is usually the basis for the number, not the number itself.
12:15
Design / safety interfacePresent dominant sequences and risk-significant contributors to designers or the safety-case team. Test whether a proposed modification genuinely reduces risk or merely moves it into a different sequence, hazard or operating state.
13:45
Quantification and uncertaintyRun the model, inspect minimal cutsets and importance measures, perform sensitivity cases, and separate numerical noise from a real risk driver. Record modelling uncertainty and assumptions that matter to the decision.
15:15
Review and regulator-facing evidenceDraft or review a PSA section for a safety case, GDA submission, risk-informed application or peer-review response. Ensure claims can be traced back to model logic, data, procedures and recognised standards.
16:45
Configuration control and handoverCommit approved model changes, update assumptions/findings logs, check independent-review actions and leave a reproducible audit trail. A PSA that cannot be recreated or explained is not a defensible safety argument.
Peer review, outages and licensing deadlines change the rhythm. During a model upgrade or ASME/ANS peer review, days become dominated by findings, evidence retrieval and technical challenge; during an outage or emergent plant issue, the focus can switch to short-timescale configuration risk. On a new reactor programme, regulator questions and design freezes can create intense bursts of re-modelling because one changed system assumption may propagate through hundreds of sequences.
Pay, 2026

What probabilistic safety assessment engineers are paid in 2026

There is no official wage series for the exact PSA/PRA engineer title. The ladders below are a TRX Q3 2026 market model anchored to live Westinghouse and Rolls-Royce SMR postings, current UK specialist PSA recruitment and the broader BLS nuclear-engineer distribution. Permanent base pay is shown; bonus, clearance, travel and overtime are excluded.

Base salary by level · excludes bonus, clearance, travel and overtime
$0$50k$100k$150k$200k
Graduate PRA / PSA Engineer I0–2 yrs
$67k
PSA / PRA Engineer2–5 yrs
$88k
Senior PSA Engineer5–9 yrs
$110k
Principal / Lead PSA Engineer8–15 yrs
$140k
PSA Technical Lead / Manager12+ yrs
$165k
Low–HighMedianTRX market analysis, Q3 2026

How probabilistic safety assessment engineering compares to adjacent roles

US figures use the BLS nuclear-engineer series where an official occupation exists and TRX Q3 2026 market models for specialist nuclear titles that are not separately coded.

OccupationMedianP10P90What moves the number
Probabilistic safety assessment engineer (nuclear)$110,000$58,000$185,000Model ownership, Level 2/3, hazards, peer review, regulator interface
Nuclear engineers (all specialties, BLS May 2025)$133,970$92,960$196,290Industry, geography, seniority and technical specialism
Nuclear safety case engineer (TRX market model)$125,000$80,000$175,000Safety-case authority, licensing, ALARP, programme criticality
Nuclear reliability / risk engineer (TRX market model)$115,000$75,000$165,000Systems depth, reliability data, maintenance and risk applications

Anchors include Westinghouse 2026 PRA Engineer I at $58,400–$73,000, Westinghouse senior PRA at $85,200–$106,500, Rolls-Royce SMR PSA engineering at £48,000–£63,000 and a UK nuclear probabilistic safety assessor market range of £60,000–£80,000. BLS nuclear engineers: median $133,970, P10 $92,960, P90 $196,290, May 2025.

Premium 01

Level 2/3, fire and seismic PRA

Many engineers can maintain an internal-events Level 1 model; fewer can own severe-accident progression, external hazards or integrated hazard results and defend the interfaces between them.

Premium 02

Peer-review and regulatory closure

Engineers who have taken an ASME/ANS peer review from preparation through findings closure, or defended PSA scope with ONR/NRC, remove schedule and licensing risk for the employer.

Premium 03

Advanced-reactor risk-informed design

FOAK developers need PSA practitioners who can work before the design is mature, manage uncertainty honestly and turn risk insights into architecture and licensing decisions rather than retrospective justification.

Routes in

Three ways in, and only one of them starts with a nuclear degree

PSA has a graduate route, but the strongest mid-career hires combine modelling with plant systems, deterministic safety or reliability experience. Software is taught faster than modelling judgement.

Route A

Graduate engineer into PRA / PSA

Five to ten years to senior level.

Year 0–2PRA Engineer ILearn plant systems, procedures, event/fault trees, data handling and model configuration under close review.
Year 2–4PSA engineerOwn defined systems or initiating events, quantify the model and begin HRA, CCF and hazard work.
Year 4–7Senior PSA engineerLead model areas, review junior work and interface directly with systems and safety-case teams.
Year 6–10Principal / subject leadOwn an integrated model or major hazard, close peer-review findings and represent PSA in design/licensing decisions.
Year 10+PSA technical lead / managerSet modelling strategy, governance and resourcing across a plant, fleet or programme.
Route B

Systems / reliability engineer into PSA

Five to twelve years.

Year 0–4Build plant knowledgeWork in mechanical, electrical, I&C, systems or reliability engineering and learn failure modes, testing and real configuration.
Year 3–6Add probabilistic methodsTrain in fault trees, event trees, reliability data, CCF and PSA software while supporting the risk team.
Year 5–8Become a model ownerOwn system logic, dependencies and data; use plant knowledge to challenge simplified assumptions.
Year 7–12Senior/principal PSALead cross-system sequences, hazard interfaces, modification assessments and risk-informed applications.
Route C

Deterministic safety / fault studies into PSA

Six to twelve years.

Step 1Establish safety-case depthWork in fault studies, design-basis analysis or nuclear safety assessment and understand safety functions and ALARP.
Step 2Learn probabilistic representationTranslate initiating events, success criteria and safety-system performance into event/fault-tree logic.
Step 3Add specialist methodsBuild depth in HRA, CCF, fire/seismic hazards or Level 2 modelling.
Step 4Integrate the evidenceExplain when PSA changes the safety argument and when deterministic requirements still govern.
Step 5Lead risk-informed safetyOwn model application, regulator engagement, peer review and integrated decision support.
Before you apply

Are you actually ready to compete for a PSA engineer role?

A credible PSA CV needs more than “fault trees” and a software name. The shortlist is looking for model scope owned, plant systems modelled, Level 1/2/3 depth, hazards covered, HRA/CCF work, peer-review or regulator exposure, risk-informed decisions influenced and evidence that your model changes survived independent technical review. If those outcomes are buried under generic safety-engineering language, the hiring team will assume you supported the model rather than owned it.

Free resume scoring on avua, TRX's job search and application platform. Your score is yours; it is not shared with employers.
Example scorecardIllustrative
68out of 100

The usual gap is not mathematics; it is proof that you owned model logic, assumptions, quantification and the engineering decision that followed.

A typical nuclear safety / reliability CV moving into PSA
68
Average of shortlisted candidates
79
Top decile for PSA engineer roles
91

Illustrative figures based on TRX shortlisting patterns across nuclear safety, risk and PSA/PRA vacancies. Your own score is generated by avua from your CV and target role.

Credentials & clearance

The credentials that actually gate the work

PSA engineering is gated by modelling competence, recognised standards and programme access rather than one statutory professional licence.

CredentialJurisdictionRequired forTimeNotes
Engineering / physics / maths degree or equivalentAllMost PSA roles3–4+ yrsSeveral STEM routes accepted.
Hands-on PSA / PRA competenceAllModel ownership2–5 yrsEvent/fault trees, HRA/CCF, data and quantification.
RiskSpectrum / CAFTA / SAPHIREAllProduction modellingMonths–yearsTool varies; logic is transferable.
ASME/ANS + NRC guidanceUSUS PRA applicationsRole-specificRG 1.200; advanced-reactor guidance where relevant.
ONR SAPs + PSA TAGsUKUK safety cases / GDARole-specificNS-TAST-GD-030 and 116 are core references.
HRA / CCF / uncertaintyAllSenior scope2–6 yrsWeak assumptions can dominate results.
BPSS / SC / DV or site accessUK / USSensitive programmes2–20+ wkProgramme-specific access requirement.
CEng / PEUK / USSenior credibility4–8 yrsPreferred, not universally required.

US work commonly references ASME/ANS PRA standards and NRC guidance such as RG 1.200; UK dutyholders use ONR SAPs and TAGs including NS-TAST-GD-030 and 116. Clearance is programme-specific.

Skills screened

What appears on a 2026 PSA engineering shortlist

Recruiters screen for people who can own a defensible probabilistic model, not simply operate a modelling package.

Hard filters

Named on the specification

  • Fault-tree and event-tree modelling — Initiating events, success criteria, dependencies, cutsets and traceable logic.
  • HRA, CCF and reliability data — Human actions, dependency, common-cause failure and defensible component data.
  • RiskSpectrum / CAFTA / SAPHIRE — Practical model development, quantification, database handling and configuration control.
  • Internal and external hazards — Internal events plus credible fire, seismic, flooding or other hazard modelling.
  • Uncertainty and risk metrics — CDF/LERF, importance measures, sensitivity cases and clear treatment of uncertainty.
  • Standards and safety-case integration — Regulatory expectations, technical writing and connection to engineering decisions.
Differentiators

What decides between two shortlisted candidates

  • Level 2 / Level 3 capability — Severe-accident progression, containment, release and consequence interfaces.
  • Peer-review finding closure — Preparing for challenge, resolving findings and demonstrating model quality.
  • Advanced-reactor risk-informed design — Applying PSA before design maturity and influencing architecture or licensing.
  • Fire and seismic PRA — Specialist hazard capability combining risk methods with spatial, fire or fragility knowledge.
  • Risk-informed applications — Configuration risk, technical specifications, maintenance, inspection/testing or plant changes.
  • Regulator and multidisciplinary influence — Explaining probabilistic results without overstating numerical precision.
One thing candidates consistently underweight: configuration control. A PSA can contain thousands of linked assumptions and logic changes, so interviews often probe how you know the result matches the plant or design being discussed. Candidates who focus on modelling sophistication but cannot explain model pedigree, independent review, assumptions and reproducibility usually sound less senior than they are.
Where the jobs are

The 2026 demand map

Demand follows programmes where risk is shaping design, licensing, life extension or operating decisions: UK new build/SMRs, the US fleet and advanced reactors.

ProgrammeLocationPhase in 2026Engineering demand
Rolls-Royce SMRUKGDA progressing; UK preferred SMR technologyVery high; live Level 1/2/3 PSA hiring.
Sizewell CSuffolk, UKFull construction after FID / financial closeHigh; EPR safety case and design-change risk support.
Hinkley Point CSomerset, UKPeak construction / reactor fit-outHigh; safety-case maturation and commissioning interfaces.
Sizewell BSuffolk, UKOperating PWR; life extension to 2055High; model maintenance, PSR and plant-change analysis.
EDF UK fleetUKOperations / life extension / defuellingMedium-high; operating and transition risk assessments.
Westinghouse / US fleet servicesUSFleet PRA upgrades and risk-informed applicationsHigh; live 2026 entry and senior PRA hiring.
TerraPower NatriumWyoming, USConstruction since April 2026Very high; advanced-reactor PRA and licensing.
newcleo LFR-AS-200US / EuropeNRC pre-application; Level 1/2 PRAVery high; live 2026 PRA recruitment.
X-energy Xe-100US / UKPre-application / 2026 regulatory engagementHigh; HTGR risk-informed design and licensing.
Kairos HermesOak Ridge, USAdvanced test reactor under constructionHigh; advanced-reactor safety and risk analysis.

Programme phases move. This table reflects confirmed 2026 status and active PSA demand centres; it does not imply every organisation has a live vacancy today.

Read the market this way

PSA is moving upstream.

Rolls-Royce SMR is recruiting across Level 1/2/3 while design progresses; newcleo is building an integrated Level 1/2 model during NRC engagement; Natrium is already in construction after its 2026 permit. The valuable engineer uses probabilistic insight early enough to change design, not merely quantify it afterwards.

The scarcity

People who can defend the chain from plant reality to risk result.

Fire/seismic plus systems depth, HRA plus operations credibility, Level 2 plus severe-accident physics, and advanced-reactor PSA plus licensing are hard combinations to hire. Software users are trainable; engineers who challenge assumptions, close peer-review findings and explain uncertainty to regulators are scarcer.

Where it leads

Adjacent and onward roles

PSA sits between nuclear safety, reliability, systems engineering and licensing. These are the closest technical siblings and progression routes.

Principal / Lead PSA EngineerIntegrated model governance, peer review, technical authority and team leadership.
Nuclear Safety Case EngineerBroadens into the complete safety argument, substantiation and ALARP case.
Fault Studies EngineerDeterministic initiating-event and transient analysis supporting PSA success criteria.
Human Reliability Analyst (Nuclear)Specialises in operator actions, dependency and HRA methods.
Severe Accident AnalystDeepens into accident progression, containment, source term and Level 2 PSA.
Nuclear Licensing EngineerUses PSA evidence in submissions, regulator engagement and risk-informed applications.
Questions

Questions nuclear engineers ask when deciding whether PSA is the right safety specialism and whether their current experience will transfer

How much does a probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) engineer earn in 2026?

The exact title is not separately coded nationally. TRX models US pay from about $58,400–$75,000 at graduate/PRA Engineer I level through $120,000–$160,000 at principal level and about $145,000–$185,000 for lead/manager scope. In the UK, a current Rolls-Royce SMR PSA role is £48,000–£63,000, with experienced specialist assessor roles around £60,000–£80,000 and lead-level market pay modelled above that. These figures reflect demand for engineers skilled in complex probabilistic safety analysis and quantitative risk assessment.

Do you need a nuclear engineering degree or professional licence?

No single degree or licence is mandatory. Nuclear, mechanical, electrical, chemical and systems engineering, physics and mathematics are all credible entry backgrounds; Westinghouse's 2026 entry role accepts several engineering disciplines, while Rolls-Royce SMR asks for engineering, physics, maths or equivalent relevant experience. CEng/PE helps at senior level, but model ownership, technical guidance, and nuclear reactor design judgement matter more.

What is the difference between a PSA engineer and a nuclear safety case engineer?

A PSA engineer builds the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) model: what can fail, how sequences combine, how likely they are and what risk metrics result. A safety case engineer owns a broader justification using deterministic safety assessment, engineering substantiation, PSA techniques, human factors and other evidence. PSA is one of the strongest quantitative inputs to the case, but it is not the whole case.

What do Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 PSA mean?

Level 1 estimates accident sequences leading to core damage or an equivalent severe plant state. Level 2 starts from those sequences and evaluates containment/plant response, severe-accident progression and radioactive release; Level 3 takes release information into off-site consequence and public/environmental risk. Many jobs are Level 1/LERF-heavy, so genuine Level 2/3 experience is a differentiator.

Which software and methods are most valuable?

RiskSpectrum is prominent in UK and European hiring, while CAFTA and SAPHIRE are common US tools; the model package matters, but fault-tree and event-tree modelling, human reliability analysis (HRA), common-cause failure (CCF), reliability data, seismic events and external hazard modelling, and uncertainty treatment are the transferable core. Increasingly, SQL, Excel automation and scripting help because large PSA models are data-management problems as well as safety models.

Is PSA engineering in demand in 2026?

Yes, especially where programmes are simultaneously designing, licensing or extending nuclear assets. Rolls-Royce SMR has a live Level 1/2/3 PSA hiring, Sizewell C is in full construction after financial close, Sizewell B has a path to 2055, Natrium entered construction in April 2026 and newcleo is actively developing an integrated Level 1/2 PRA during NRC engagement. The tightest market is for senior people who can provide technical guidance, own model quality and regulatory challenge, not simply run quantification.

Nuclear only

We only recruit in nuclear. That is the whole point.

TRX works across operating-fleet risk, new build, SMRs, advanced reactors, defence nuclear and safety-case programmes in 14+ countries. Send us your CV and we will tell you whether it reads as PSA ownership, adjacent safety/reliability experience or a credible route into probabilistic safety — and which specialism your experience fits.